Evaluation Dashboard Template
A comprehensive evaluation-focused dashboard template featuring comparison functionality, stakeholder-specific views, data export capabilities, and advanced impact assessment tools for strategic decision-making and program evaluation.
✅ Production Ready
🔧 Interactive
♿ WCAG AA
📱 Responsive
📊 Comparison
Impact Evaluation Dashboard
Comprehensive analysis and comparison of program outcomes
Select Items to Compare
Overall Impact Score
vs comparison
Beneficiaries Reached
% of target
vs comparison
Cost per Beneficiary
%
vs baseline
vs comparison
Sustainability Index
vs comparison
Outcome Trends
Key outcomes over time
Impact Distribution
Impact across different dimensions
Comparative Analysis
Detailed comparison between selected items
Metric | Primary | Comparison | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Key Findings
Impact:
Confidence:
Action:
Quick Actions
Export Options
Evaluation Template HTML Structure
<!-- Evaluation Dashboard Template Structure -->
<div class="evaluation-dashboard" x-data="evaluationDashboardTemplate()">
<!-- Dashboard Controls -->
<div class="evaluation-controls">
<select x-model="selectedStakeholder">
<option value="executive">Executive View</option>
<option value="program">Program Manager View</option>
</select>
<label class="comparison-toggle">
<input type="checkbox" x-model="comparisonMode">
Comparison Mode
</label>
</div>
<!-- Comparison Selection -->
<div x-show="comparisonMode" class="comparison-selection">
<select x-model="comparison.primary">
<template x-for="item in comparisonItems">
<option :value="item.id" x-text="item.name"></option>
</template>
</select>
<select x-model="comparison.secondary">
<template x-for="item in comparisonItems">
<option :value="item.id" x-text="item.name"></option>
</template>
</select>
</div>
<!-- KPI Grid -->
<div class="kpi-grid">
<div class="kpi-card">
<div x-text="evaluationData.overallScore + '/100'"></div>
<div>Overall Impact Score</div>
<div x-show="comparisonMode">
<span x-text="formatChange(evaluationData.overallScoreChange)"></span>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Additional KPIs... -->
</div>
<!-- Charts Section -->
<div class="charts-grid">
<canvas x-ref="outcomesChart"></canvas>
<canvas x-ref="impactChart"></canvas>
</div>
<!-- Comparison Analysis -->
<div x-show="comparisonMode" class="comparison-analysis">
<canvas x-ref="comparisonChart"></canvas>
<table class="comparison-table">
<template x-for="metric in comparisonMetrics">
<tr>
<td x-text="metric.name"></td>
<td x-text="metric.primary"></td>
<td x-text="metric.secondary"></td>
<td x-text="formatChange(metric.difference)"></td>
</tr>
</template>
</table>
</div>
<!-- Stakeholder Insights -->
<div class="insights-section">
<template x-for="finding in getStakeholderFindings(selectedStakeholder)">
<div class="finding-card">
<h4 x-text="finding.title"></h4>
<p x-text="finding.description"></p>
</div>
</template>
</div>
</div>
Alpine.js Component Logic
function evaluationDashboardTemplate() {
return {
// Template state
theme: 'light',
showCode: false,
previewMode: false,
selectedStakeholder: 'executive',
selectedPeriod: 'current',
comparisonMode: false,
// Comparison settings
comparison: {
primary: 'program-1',
secondary: 'program-2',
type: 'side-by-side'
},
// Evaluation data
evaluationData: {
overallScore: 87,
overallScoreChange: +5,
beneficiariesReached: 156000,
beneficiariesChange: +12,
targetBeneficiaries: 180000,
costPerBeneficiary: 125,
costEfficiencyTrend: -8,
costEfficiencyChange: -15,
sustainabilityIndex: 82,
sustainabilityChange: +7
},
// Comparison items
comparisonItems: [
{ id: 'program-1', name: 'Health Initiative Romania' },
{ id: 'program-2', name: 'Education Program Ghana' },
{ id: 'program-3', name: 'Climate Action Colombia' }
],
// Stakeholder findings
stakeholderFindings: {
executive: [
{
id: 1,
type: 'positive',
title: 'Strong ROI Performance',
description: 'The program demonstrates exceptional return on investment with 87% impact score.',
impact: 'High',
confidence: 'Very High',
recommendation: 'Consider scaling successful elements'
}
],
program: [
{
id: 1,
type: 'concern',
title: 'Resource Allocation Efficiency',
description: 'Some budget categories showing higher than expected utilization rates.',
impact: 'Medium',
confidence: 'High',
recommendation: 'Review procurement processes'
}
]
},
// Charts
outcomesChart: null,
impactChart: null,
comparisonChart: null,
// Initialization
init() {
this.initTheme();
this.$nextTick(() => {
this.initCharts();
});
},
// Chart initialization
initCharts() {
this.initOutcomesChart();
this.initImpactChart();
if (this.comparisonMode) {
this.initComparisonChart();
}
},
// Methods
toggleComparisonMode() {
if (this.comparisonMode && this.$refs.comparisonChart) {
this.$nextTick(() => {
this.initComparisonChart();
});
}
},
getStakeholderFindings(stakeholder) {
return this.stakeholderFindings[stakeholder] || [];
},
getStakeholderLabel(stakeholder) {
const labels = {
executive: 'Executive Leadership',
program: 'Program Managers',
financial: 'Financial Team',
impact: 'Impact Specialists'
};
return labels[stakeholder] || stakeholder;
},
formatChange(value) {
return value > 0 ? `+${value}%` : `${value}%`;
},
getComparisonColor(value) {
if (value > 0) return 'text-green-600 dark:text-green-400';
if (value < 0) return 'text-red-600 dark:text-red-400';
return 'text-gray-600 dark:text-gray-400';
}
};
}